Hess and Krush Qualify For Semi-Finals
Submitted by SonofPearl on Chess.com
GM Robert Hess and IM Irina Krush kept up their winning streaks in round six of the U.S. Championship and U.S. Women’s Championship, respectively. In the penultimate round of preliminary play, Hess won his fourth game in a row and Krush her fifth. They have both become the first two players to automatically qualify for the semifinals in each tournament. The events are taking place from April 14-28 at the Chess Club and Scholastic Center of Saint Louis.
As in round five, Hess tried to play solidly again out of the opening. He accepted GM Larry Christiansen’s pawn sacrifice, after which he said he was “extremely satisfied” with his position. Christiansen had to play aggressively, as he began the round on the outside looking in at qualification.
Hess said he is not overjoyed at his play, but “thankfully my opponents have been making mistakes as well. Fortunately I’m here with five out of six so I can laugh at my mistakes.” He added that winning four games in a row may be a rarity at the U.S. Championship but it was not as important as winning the title itself. He has already clinched sole first place in the group and with it a $2,000 bonus. Since scores are erased when the semifinals begin, his game against GM Yasser Seirawan tomorrow will only really matter for his opponent.
Hess qualified for the semi-finals with a round to spare
Christiansen, Larry vs. Hess, Robert
2011 US Championship Group B | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 0-1
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Bb4+ 4. Bd2 Qe7 5. g3 Nc6 6. Bg2 Bxd2+ 7. Qxd2 Ne4 8. Qc2 Qb4+ 9. Nc3 Nxc3 10. bxc3 Qxc4 11. O-O O-O 12. Rab1 d5 13. Rfc1 Ne7 14. e3 Qa6 15. Ng5 Ng6 16. c4 c6 17. h4 h6 18. Nf3 Qxc4 19. Qxc4 dxc4 20. Rxc4 Rd8 21. h5 Ne7 22. Ne1 Rd6 23. Nd3 b6 24. Ne5 Ba6 25. Rc3 Be2 26. Ra3 Nd5 27. e4 Nc7 28. Rc3 Bb5 29. Nf3 Rad8 30. Rbc1 Na6 31. Ra3 Be2 32. Ne5 Rxd4 33. Rxc6 Bb5 34. Rcc3 Ra4 35. Rab3 Be8 36. a3 Nc5 37. Rb4 Rd4 38. Nc4 f6 39. e5 fxe5 40. Rxa4 Nxa4 41. Rc1 Bxh5 42. Nxe5 Nc5 43. Nc6 Ra4 44. Rc3 Bd1 45. Bh3 g5 46. Ne5 Kg7 47. Re3 Bb3 48. Nd7 Nxd7 49. Rxb3 g4 50. Bf1 Ne5 51. Be2 Kf6 52. Rc3 a6 53. Kg2 b5 54. Bd1 Rc4 55. Re3 Rc1 56. Be2 Re1 57. Re4 h5 58. Kh2 a5 59. Kg2 b4 60. axb4 axb4 61. Rf4+ Ke7 62. Bf1 Rb1 63. Be2 Kd6 64. Rf8 b3 65. Rb8 Kc5 66. Rb5+ Kd4 67. Bf1 Nf3 68. Rxh5 e5 69. Rh8 Rxf1 70. Rd8+ Ke4 71. Kxf1 b2 72. Rd1 b1=Q 73. Kg2 Nh4+
In the U.S. Women’s Championship, second-ranked IM Irina Krush, the defending champion, continued her domination of the field by posting her fifth win in a row after suffering an opening-round upset. In round six she took out WIM Iryna Zenyuk to become the first woman to qualify for the semifinals.
Krush is trailed by a cavalcade of players with four points. WGM Sabina Foiser and WGM Camilla Baginskaite had the quickest draw of the tournament to cement their placements. WFM Tatev Abrahamyan drew FM Alisa Melekhina in a wild affair to equal them. “My games have been so bad,” a relieved Abrahamyan said. Foisor, Baginskaite and Abrahmyan would have all earned certain qualification were it not for the timely win by top-seeded IM Anna Zatonskih, who partially bounced back with a win as Black to get to three points.
Krush, Irina vs. Zenyuk, Iryna
2011 US Womens Championship | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1-0
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. O-O Nc6 8. d5 Ne7 9. Ne1 Nd7 10. Be3 f5 11. f3 f4 12. Bf2 g5 13. Rc1 a6 14. Nd3 b6 15. b4 Rf6 16. c5 Rh6 17. cxd6 cxd6 18. b5 Qe8 19. Kh1 a5 20. Na4 Rb8 21. Ndb2 Nf6 22. Nc4 Nh5 23. Qe1 Nxd5 24. exd5 e4 25. fxe4 g4 26. Naxb6 g3 27. Bxh5 Qxh5 28. Bxg3 fxg3 29. Qxg3 Bg4 30. Ne3 Be2 31. Nf5 Rg6 32. Ne7+ Kh8 33. Nxg6+ hxg6 34. Nd7 Bxf1 35. Nxb8 Bxb5 36. Nc6
Zatonskih kept her hopes of qualification alive
Goletiani, Rusudan vs. Zatonskih, Anna
2011 US Womens Championship | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 0-1
1. c4 e6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. Nf3 dxc4 5. Qa4+ Nbd7 6. Qxc4 a6 7. Qc2 c5 8. b3 Rb8 9. Bb2 b6 10. O-O Bb7 11. d3 Bd6 12. Nbd2 O-O 13. Nc4 Bc7 14. e4 Re8 15. Rad1 e5 16. Qc1 h6 17. Qa1 Qe7 18. Nh4 b5 19. Nf5 Qf8 20. Nce3 g6 21. Nh4 Nh5 22. Ng4 Nhf6 23. Nxf6+ Nxf6 24. f4 Qe7 25. Qc1 exf4 26. gxf4 Nh5 27. Qc3 Kh7 28. Bf3 b4 29. Qc4 Nxf4 30. Bg4 Rf8 31. Ng2 Nxg2 32. Kxg2 f5 33. Bf3 Rbe8 34. Kh1 Bd6 35. exf5 Rxf5 36. Be4 Ref8 37. Rxf5 gxf5 38. Rg1 fxe4 39. Rg7+ Qxg7 40. Bxg7 e3+ 41. Kg1 e2
Abrahamyan, Tatev vs. Melekhina, Alisa
2011 US Womens Championship | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1/2-1/2
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e5 6. Ndb5 d6 7. Bg5 a6 8. Na3 b5 9. Nd5 Be7 10. Bxf6 Bxf6 11. c3 Ne7 12. Nxf6+ gxf6 13. Nc2 Bb7 14. Bd3 d5 15. exd5 Qxd5 16. Ne3 Qe6 17. a4 Rd8 18. Qc2 e4 19. Be2 f5 20. g3 O-O 21. axb5 axb5 22. Bxb5 Ng6 23. Be2 f4 24. gxf4 Nxf4 25. Rd1 Qg6 26. c4 Rd3 27. c5 Rfd8 28. Bxd3 exd3 29. Qc4 Ng2+ 30. Kd2 Nxe3 31. Qh4 Re8 32. fxe3 Bxh1 33. Rxh1 Qg2+ 34. Kxd3 Qd5+ 35. Ke2 Qg2+ 36. Kd3 Qd5+ 37. Ke2 Qg2+
Foisor, Sabina-Francesca vs. Baginskaite, Camilla
2011 US Womens Championship | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1/2-1/2
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. Bg5 h6 6. Bxf6 Qxf6 7. e3 O-O 8. Qb3 c5 9. dxc5 Bxc3+ 10. Qxc3 Qxc3+ 11. bxc3 Nd7 12. cxd5 exd5 13. Rd1 Nxc5 14. Rxd5 b6 15. c4 Be6 16. Rd4 Rac8 17. Be2 Rc7 18. Kd2 Rfc8 19. Rb1 Nb7 20. Kc3 Na5 21. Nd2 Nc6 22. Rd6 Na5 23. Rd4 Nc6 24. Rd6 Na5 25. Rd4 Nc6 26. Rd6
The scenarios in the women’s event for round seven are either simple or complicated, depending on Zatonskih’s game. She will play Foisor tomorrow needing a win. If she loses or draws, then Foisor, Abrahmyan and Baginskaite all join Krush in the semifinals. If Zatonskih wins, she will tie Foisor and perhaps the other two women, depending on their results. The tiebreak procedures vary depending on the number of women and the number of semifinal openings, but suffice to say they are complicated and every woman involved asked to have them explained by assistant arbiter Tony Rich after round six.
With Hess already in, the remainder of the pack in his group tried to keep up. GM-elect Sam Shankland rebounded after a round five loss by drawing local GM Ben Finegold. Their game was one of the few in the tournament to be settled with imbalances everywhere. “I’m really disappointed with my game today,” Shankland said. “Ben sacrificed a pawn for what I thought was insignificant compensation.” Asked why he agreed to the draw, Shankland said there was too much risk in the position. “I’m either going to get mated or run my pawns through. I saw that Alex (Onischuk) had a bad position. But I don’t like losing a White against the lowest player in the competition.”
Shankland, Samuel vs. Finegold, Benjamin
2011 US Championship Group B | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1/2-1/2
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 d5 4. e3 g6 5. d4 Bg7 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O e6 8. Qc2 Nbd7 9. Rd1 b6 10. b3 Bb7 11. Ba3 Re8 12. Rac1 Qb8 13. Nd2 c5 14. dxc5 bxc5 15. Na4 d4 16. Nxc5 dxe3 17. fxe3 Nxc5 18. Bxc5 h5 19. Bf3 Ng4 20. Nf1 Bxf3 21. gxf3 Ne5 22. Qg2 Qb7 23. f4 Nf3+ 24. Kf2 Qc8 25. Qxf3 Qxc5 26. Rd7 a5 27. Qb7 Rab8 28. Qa7 Qf5 29. Ng3 Qf6 30. Rcd1 Ra8 31. Qb7 a4 32. R7d3 axb3 33. axb3 e5 34. Qf3 Ra2+
Shankland was looking over his shoulder at GM Onischuk to make sure he would not be passed in the standings. Onischuk went on to draw his game, the longest of the round, to remain tied with Shankland. The pair are the only players in the group with 3.5/6 and they are slated to play tomorrow (Onischuk has White). Should the game be decisive, the winner will join Hess in advancing past group play. If they draw, they will play again on Friday in a playoff. They could also be joined by Seirawan in that scenario, who would need to win as Black versus Hess to enter the picture.
Seirawan, Yasser vs. Onischuk, Alexander
2011 US Championship Group B | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1/2-1/2
1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. g3 d5 4. b3 c5 5. Bg2 Nc6 6. O-O Be7 7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. Bb2 O-O 9. Nc3 Bf6 10. Qc2 Ndb4 11. Qb1 b6 12. a3 Nd5 13. b4 Rb8 14. Rc1 Nxc3 15. Bxc3 Nd4 16. Bxd4 cxd4 17. d3 Bb7 18. Ra2 Qd7 19. Rac2 Rfc8 20. Nd2 Bd5 21. Bxd5 exd5 22. Nf3 g6 23. Qb3 Rxc2 24. Qxc2 Re8 25. Qc6 Qe6 26. b5 Kf8 27. Rc2 Qxc6 28. Rxc6 Re6 29. Rc8+ Re8 30. Rc2 Re7 31. Kf1 Ke8 32. Rc6 Bg7 33. Ng5 h6 34. Nh3 Kd7 35. Nf4 Re5 36. a4 Bf8 37. Rf6 Ke7 38. Rc6 Kd7 39. a5 bxa5 40. Ra6 Bc5 41. Rxa5 Kd6 42. Ra2 Re7 43. Ke1 Rb7 44. Ra6+ Bb6 45. Ra2 Rc7 46. Kd1 Rc3 47. Rb2 Ra3 48. Rc2 Ra1+ 49. Rc1 Rxc1+ 50. Kxc1 Kc5 51. Kb2 Bc7 52. Ng2 Ba5 53. Nh4 Bd8 54. Ng2 Kxb5 55. Nf4 Kc5 56. Kb3 Bg5 57. Ng2 Bd2 58. Nh4 Kd6 59. f4 Be3 60. Ka4 g5 61. fxg5 Bxg5 62. Nf3 Bd8 63. Nxd4 h5 64. Kb5 Bb6 65. Nf5+ Ke5 66. Ng7 h4 67. gxh4 Kf6 68. Nh5+ Kf5 69. Ng3+ Kg4 70. h5 Kg5 71. Kc6 Bg1 72. Kxd5 Bxh2 73. Nf1 Bg1 74. Ng3 Bh2 75. Nf1 Bg1 76. Ke5 Kxh5 77. Kf6 a5 78. Kxf7 a4 79. Nd2 a3 80. Ke6 Kg4 81. Kd5 Kf4 82. e4 Ke3 83. Nc4+ Kxd3 84. Nxa3 Bh2 85. Nc4 Bg3 86. e5 Bxe5 87. Nxe5+
Shabalov, Alexander vs. Kaidanov, Gregory
2011 US Championship Group B | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 0-1
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bg5 c5 5. d5 d6 6. e3 exd5 7. cxd5 Nbd7 8. Bb5 Qa5 9. Bxd7+ Nxd7 10. Ne2 f6 11. Bf4 Ne5 12. O-O O-O 13. Qc2 Qd8 14. a3 Ba5 15. Ne4 Qe7 16. N4g3 g6 17. h4 Bd7 18. h5 g5 19. Bxe5 Qxe5 20. e4 f5 21. Nxf5 Bxf5 22. exf5 Rxf5 23. Ng3 Rf4 24. Rad1 Raf8 25. b3 c4 26. bxc4 Bb6 27. Nh1 g4 28. Rd2 Qxh5 29. Re2 R4f6 30. Re6 Rxe6 31. dxe6 Qe5 32. Qd3 Qxe6 33. Ng3 Rxf2 34. Rxf2 Qe1+ 35. Kh2 Bxf2 36. Ne2 Bc5
In the other U.S. Championship group, defending champion GM Gata Kamsky outplayed IM Daniel Naroditsky from an equal position. By trading queens early, Kamsky said his teenage opponent made his first psychological mistake. “It showed me he was playing for a draw,” Kamsky said. “He was probably giving me too much respect.” The win puts Kamsky at 4.5/6 and a half-point edge over second place GM Yury Shulman, who has quietly kept up with the leader.
Naroditsky, Daniel vs. Kamsky, Gata
2011 US Championship Group A | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 0-1
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. Nd2 e6 5. Nb3 Nd7 6. Nf3 Ne7 7. Be2 h6 8. c3 Bh7 9. h4 a6 10. Bf4 Rc8 11. h5 c5 12. Nxc5 Nxc5 13. dxc5 Rxc5 14. Nd4 Rc8 15. Qa4+ Qd7 16. Qxd7+ Kxd7 17. Kd2 Nc6 18. Nxc6 Rxc6 19. Be3 Be7 20. Bd3 Bxd3 21. Kxd3 Rhc8 22. Rh3 Ke8 23. Bd4 b5 24. a3 a5 25. Rg3 Kf8 26. f4 Bc5 27. Bxc5+ Rxc5 28. Rf1 b4 29. axb4 axb4 30. Kd2 d4 31. Rc1 Rc4 32. Rf3 dxc3+ 33. bxc3 Rd8+ 34. Ke2 Re4+ 35. Kf1 Rc8 36. g3 Rec4 37. Ke2 bxc3 38. Rc2 f6 39. Re3 Kf7 40. Kf3 R8c5 41. exf6 gxf6 42. Rd3 Ke7 43. Re3 e5 44. fxe5 fxe5 45. g4 Kf6 46. Kg3 Kg5 47. Kh3 Kf4 48. Re1 e4 49. Rf2+ Ke5 50. Rf5+ Kd4 51. Rf4 Kd3 52. Rd1+ Kc2 53. Rff1 e3 54. Rc1+ Kd3 55. Rfd1+ Ke4 56. Kg3 c2 57. Rd8 Rd4
Shulman tried everything he could to beat GM Ray Robson, at one point eschewing several chances to repeat the position. Eventually the attack petered out and Shulman agreed to terms with his opponent when his rook and three pawns could not overcome Robson’s rook and bishop.
Shulman, Yuri vs. Robson, Ray
2011 US Championship Group A | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1/2-1/2
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. Be2 e5 7. Be3 Ng4 8. Bg5 f6 9. Bh4 g5 10. Bg3 Nh6 11. c5 g4 12. Nh4 Nc6 13. dxe5 fxe5 14. cxd6 cxd6 15. O-O Nd4 16. Bc4+ Kh8 17. Qd2 Ng8 18. Ne2 Nf6 19. Nxd4 Nxe4 20. Qe2 d5 21. Bxd5 Qxd5 22. Nb5 Nxg3 23. hxg3 Qd7 24. Rfd1 Qe7 25. Rac1 Bd7 26. Rc7 Bxb5 27. Rxe7 Bxe2 28. Rdd7 Bf6 29. Rxh7+ Kg8 30. Nf5 Be7 31. Rh5 Bf6 32. Nh6+ Kh8 33. Nf5+ Kg8 34. Nh6+ Kh8 35. Nxg4+ Kg8 36. Nh6+ Kh8 37. g4 Bb5 38. Nf5+ Kg8 39. Nh6+ Kh8 40. Nf5+ Kg8 41. Rxb7 Rfb8 42. Nh6+ Kh8 43. Nf5+ Kg8 44. Rc7 Rc8 45. Nh6+ Kh8 46. Nf5+ Kg8 47. Ne7+ Bxe7 48. Rxe7 Re8 49. Rexe5 Rxe5 50. Rxe5 a6 51. Rd5 Bc4 52. Rg5+ Kf7 53. b3 Be6 54. f3 a5 55. Rc5 a4 56. bxa4 Rxa4 57. Kf2 Rxa2+ 58. Kg3 Rd2 59. Rc7+ Kf6 60. Rc6 Kf7 61. Rc7+
Ivanov, Alexander vs. Akobian, Varuzhan
2011 US Championship Group A | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1-0
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 4. e5 Nfd7 5. c3 c5 6. f4 Nc6 7. Ndf3 Qb6 8. a3 Be7 9. h4 cxd4 10. cxd4 Na5 11. g3 Nb3 12. Rb1 Nxc1 13. Qxc1 Qd8 14. Bd3 Nb6 15. Ne2 Bd7 16. b3 Rc8 17. Qb2 O-O 18. O-O Na8 19. Ra1 Qb6 20. a4 Nc7 21. Qb1 h6 22. g4 Na6 23. g5 Nb4 24. gxh6 gxh6 25. Kh1 Kh8 26. a5 Qd8 27. f5 Rg8 28. f6 Bf8 29. Bh7 Bb5 30. Bxg8 Bd3 31. Qd1 Kxg8 32. Rg1+ Kh8 33. Nf4 Be4 34. Rg3 Rc3 35. Rc1 Nc2 36. Kh2 Ba3 37. Ng5 hxg5 38. Rxc3 Bxc1 39. Qxc1 gxf4 40. Qg1
Ehlvest, Jaan vs. Stripunsky, Alexander
2011 US Championship Group A | Saint Louis | Round 6| 20 Apr 2011 | 1-0
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Bd3 Nf6 7. f4 b5 8. e5 b4 9. Ne4 Nxe4 10. Bxe4 Bb7 11. Qf3 Nc6 12. Be3 Rc8 13. Nb3 d5 14. exd6 Bxd6 15. O-O-O f5 16. Bd3 O-O 17. Qf2 Ne7 18. Nd4 Rf6 19. Rhe1 Kh8 20. g3 e5 21. fxe5 Bxe5 22. Bg5 Bxd4 23. Qxd4 Rd6 24. Qf2 Rxd3 25. Rxd3 Be4 26. Rd2 b3 27. a3 Ng6 28. Re3 Qb7 29. Rc3 Re8 30. Rxb3 Qf7 31. Bf4 h6 32. Qd4 Rc8 33. Rc3 Rxc3 34. Qxc3 Kh7 35. b3 h5 36. Bg5 Qe6 37. Qc5 Bf3 38. Kb2 Qe1 39. Qxf5 Bg4 40. Qc5
Round seven will also be intriguing for this group as Kamsky and Shulman, the two highest seeds in the group, are paired. Conventional wisdom suggests Kamsky will be content with a draw to ensure first place in the group. If so, Shulman would be guaranteed no worse than a playoff for the second qualification spot. He would only enter the tiebreaker match if GM Alexander Ivanov could somehow beat GM Ray Robson as Black.
All other players in the U.S. Championship have been officially eliminated from title contention, but each difference in final placement means $1,000 of prize money, so there is still much left to play for.
To follow the dramatic round seven and to hear grandmaster commentary from GM Maurice Ashley and WGM Jennifer Shahade, log on to www.uschesschamps.com at 2 p.m. local, 3 p.m. Eastern on Thursday.
Group A | |||||||||||
1 | GM Kamsky, Gata | 2733 | x | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | ½ | 4.5 | |
2 | GM Shulman, Yuri | 2622 | x | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 4.0 | |
3 | GM Ivanov, Alexander | 2540 | ½ | 0 | x | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 3.5 | |
4 | GM Robson, Ray | 2522 | ½ | ½ | x | ½ | ½ | 0 | 1 | 3.0 | |
5 | GM Akobian, Varuzhan | 2611 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | x | ½ | 1 | 2.5 | |
6 | GM Ehlvest, Jaan | 2586 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | x | ½ | 1 | 2.5 | |
7 | IM Naroditsky, Daniel | 2438 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | x | 2.5 | |
8 | GM Stripunsky, Alexander | 2578 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | x | 1.5 | |
Group B | |||||||||||
1 | GM Hess, Robert L | 2565 | x | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 5.0 | |
2 | GM Onischuk, Alexander | 2678 | 0 | x | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 3.5 | |
3 | IM Shankland, Samuel L | 2512 | ½ | x | ½ | 1 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 3.5 | |
4 | GM Seirawan, Yasser | 2636 | ½ | ½ | x | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 3.0 | |
5 | GM Christiansen, Larry M | 2586 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | x | ½ | 1 | 2.5 | |
6 | GM Finegold, Benjamin | 2500 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | x | 1 | 2.5 | |
7 | GM Shabalov, Alexander | 2590 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 0 | x | 0 | 2.0 | |
8 | GM Kaidanov, Gregory S | 2569 | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | x | 2.0 | |
Women | |||||||||||
1 | IM Krush, Irina | 2472 | x | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.0 | |
2 | WGM Foisor, Sabina-Francesca | 2350 | 1 | x | ½ | ½ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.0 | |
3 | WGM Baginskaite, Camilla | 2342 | ½ | x | 0 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4.0 | |
4 | WFM Abrahamyan, Tatev | 2326 | 0 | ½ | 1 | x | 1 | 1 | ½ | 4.0 | |
5 | IM Zatonskih, Anna | 2499 | 0 | ½ | 0 | x | 1 | 1 | ½ | 3.0 | |
6 | IM Goletiani, Rusudan | 2367 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | x | ½ | 1.5 | |
7 | WIM Zenyuk, Iryna | 2245 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | x | 1 | 1.5 | |
8 | FM Melekhina, Alisa | 2304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | x | 1.0 |
No comments:
Post a Comment