Cheating in chess
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cheating in chess refers to rule breaking or other unethical behaviours that are intended to give an unfair advantage to a player or team. Cheating can occur in many forms
[1] and can take place before, during, or possibly even after a game. Commonly cited instances of cheating include: collusion with spectators or other players linking to remote computers, rating manipulation, misuse of the
Touch-move rule, the pre-arranged
draw, and the use of
psychological tactics to unsettle an opponent. Many suspiciously-motivated practices are not comprehensively covered by the
rules of chess and so, on ethical or 'moral conduct' grounds only, may be judged by some as acceptable and by others, as cheating.
History
Cheating at chess is almost as old as the game itself, and may even have caused
chess-related deaths. According to one legend, a dispute over cheating at chess led King
Canute to murder a Danish nobleman.
Automaton hoaxes
Rather than the modern problem in which humans cheat by surreptitiously reproducing the play of machines, in the 18th and 19th centuries the public were hoaxed by the opposite deception in which machines reproduced the moves of hidden humans. The first and most famous of the chess automaton hoaxes was
The Turk (
1770), followed by
Ajeeb (1868) and
Mephisto (1886).
Collusion
Over the years there have been many accusations of collusion, either of players deliberately losing (often to help a friend or teammate get a
title norm), or of players agreeing to draws to help both players in a tournament.
Researchers at
Washington University in St. Louis claim that Soviet chess masters may have colluded in world chess championships held from 1940 to 1964.
[2] [3] The study argues that the Soviet players agreed to draws amongst themselves to help their chances. While it is generally believed that these agreements happened at times, opinions differ over how effective their agreements were. The most famous alleged instance, the 1962
Candidates' Tournament is discussed further at the
World Chess Championship 1963 article.
Touch piece rule
In tournament chess, there are certain "touch piece" rules. Often these are difficult to rule on, because the only witnesses are the two players involved.
In one famous instance,
Garry Kasparov changed his move against
Judit Polgár in 1994 after momentarily letting go of a piece (a violation of the "touch piece" rule). Kasparov went on to win the game. The tournament officials allegedly had video tape proving that his hand left the piece, but refused to release the video evidence and allow Polgár the win. Also against Polgar was the fact that she waited one full day before issuing her complaint.
Cheating with technology
Technology has been used by chess cheats in several ways. Perhaps the most common form is to use a chess program while playing chess remotely, usually through online chess servers. Or, to boost ratings on a chess server, a competitor may sign on through a different IP address to play and lose against themselves. Electronic communication with an accomplice during face-to-face competitive chess is another reported technique.
Communication with an accomplice
One of the earliest known cases of using technology to cheat was in
1993 at the World Open, a dreadlocked, headphone-wearing, unrated newcomer, who took the name "John von Neumann" (matching the name of a famous artificial intelligence research pioneer), scored 4.5/9 in the Open Section, including a draw with a grandmaster and a win over a 2350 player. This "von Neumann" seemed to have a suspicious bulge in one of his pockets, which appeared to make a soft humming or buzzing sound at important points in the game. "When quizzed by the tournament director, the ‘lesser’ von Neumann was unable to demonstrate even a rudimentary knowledge of some simple chess concepts, and he was disqualified.
[4]
In Lampertsheim Open Tournament 2003 the arbiter announced the disqualification of a player before round seven. Volker Widmann explained what had happened: "In the sixth round a player came to me and said he suspected his opponent, W.S. from L., was using illicit aids during the game. He often left the board for protracted periods of time to go to the toilet, even when (especially when) it was his turn to play. He had done this in earlier rounds against other players as well. I watched W.S. and noticed that he played a number of moves very rapidly and then disappeared in the toilet. I followed him and could hear no sound coming from the stall. I looked under the door and saw that his feet were pointing sideways, so that he could not have been using the toilet. So I entered the neighbouring stall, stood on the toilet bowl and looked over the dividing wall. I saw W.S. standing there with a handheld PC which displayed a running chess program. He was using a stylus to operate it.I immediately disqualified the player. When confronted he claimed that he was only checking his emails, so I asked him to show me the computer, which he refused to do. There are witnesses for my investigation in the toilet, and we will ask the chess federation of our state to ban the player from playing in other tournaments."
In HB Global Chess Challenge 2005, a player in the Under-2000 section exited the event under suspicion of cheating, while his final-round game was under way. According to tournament officials, he was caught repeatedly talking on his cell phone during his game – which the published rules for that event expressly prohibited. Directors suspected that he was receiving moves over the phone from an accomplice elsewhere in the building. His results were expunged from the tournament and an ethics complaint lodge. Six weeks later, the same player entered the World Open and tied for 1st-3rd in the Under-2200 section, pocketing a cool $5,833. An attempt was made to eject him midway through that event, when the organizers belatedly learned about the earlier incident in Minnesota. But, lacking any specific allegation that he was cheating in the World Open, they backtracked and re-admitted him after he threatened legal action
[5]
In Subroto Mukerjee memorial international rating chess tournament 2006, an Indian chess player was banned from playing competitive chess for ten years due to cheating.
[6] During the tournament at Subroto Park,
Umakant Sharma was caught receiving instructions from an accomplice using a
chess computer via a
Bluetooth-enabled device which had been sewn into his cap.
[7][8] The accomplices he had been communicating with were outside the location at which he was playing, and were relaying moves from a computer simulation. Officials became suspicious after Sharma made unusually large gains in rating points during the previous eighteen months, even qualifying for the national championship.
[8] Umakant began the year with an average rating of 1933, and in 64 games gained over 500 points to attain a rating of 2484. Officials received multiple written complaints alleging that Umakant's moves were in the exact same sequence suggested by the chess computer
HIARCS 10.
[7] Eventually, in the seventh round of the tournament,
Indian Air Force officials searched the players at the top eight boards with a metal detector and found that Umakant was the only player who was cheating. Umakant's ten-year ban was imposed by the All India Chess Federation (AICF) after reviewing evidence presented by Umakant himself and the electronic devices seized by the tournament organizers.
[6] The penalty was considered harsh, especially considering that those in other sports who have been found to be
doping and
match fixing did not receive such lengthy suspensions.
[9] When officials were asked about the suspension they stated, "We wanted to be frank and send a stern message to all players. It is like cheating on exams."
[9]
In Philadelphia World open 2006, Steve Rosenberg, who was playing in a lower section and was leading before the final round. A victory would have been worth about $18,000. He was confronted by a tournament director and found to be using a wireless transmitter and receiver called a "Phonito". He was disqualified from the event.
[10]
Dutch League 2C 2007 match between Bergen vs Zoom-AAS, the arbiter caught the team captain of AAS (who was playing himself on board 6), using a PDA. The player was outside the playing hall, with permission, to get some fresh air. The arbiter had followed him and caught him using PocketFritz. On the screen, the actual position of the game was shown. The arbiter declared the game lost and informed the Dutch Federation about the incident. The competition manager communicated a heavy penalty: the player has been banned to play in the Dutch League and Cup matches, not only for this season, but also for next two seasons. The competition manager applied article 20.3 of the Federation’s competition regulations.
[11]
In Dubai Open 2008, M Sadatnajafi, an untitled
Iranian player (rated 2288 at the time), was disqualified from the tournament after he was caught receiving suggested moves by
text message on his
mobile phone while playing Grandmaster
Li Chao.
[12] The game was being relayed live over the internet and it was alleged that his friends were following it and guiding him using a computer.
[12]
In Norths Chess Club Centenary Year Under 1600 Tournament a player was caught using what the arbiter called a “hand held machine” in the toilets. The game was declared lost and the boy was expelled from the tournament. The 14-year old was using the program
Chessmaster on a
Playstation Portable, and that was probably the reason why the moves were not particularly strong. It’s the first example of a chess player getting caught while using an electronic device in Australia, and so it quickly became a big story in the relatively small Australian chess community.
[13]
Rating manipulation
Ratings manipulation occurs when game results are determined before the game starts or by falsifying tournament reports. The most common type is called sandbagging, where a person plays in lower entry fee tournaments and loses to lower their rating so they can play in a large money tournament in a lower section, and increase their chance of winning. Sandbagging, however, is very difficult to detect and prove, so
USCF has included minimum ratings based on previous ratings or money winnings to minimize the effect. The most notable example of ratings manipulation involves Romanian Alexandru Crisan, who falsified tournament reports to gain a Grandmaster title and ranked 33rd in the world on
FIDE ratings list. A committee overseeing the matter recommended his rating erased and his Grandmaster title revoked, but this has not happened.
[14][15]
Simultaneous games
A player with no knowledge of chess can achieve a 50% score in
simultaneous chess by replicating the moves made by one of his white opponents in a match against a black opponent, and vice versa; the opponents in effect play each other rather than the cheater. This trick was attempted in
correspondence chess matches against
Alexander Alekhine and
Efim Bogoljubov, which they uncovered after discussing the games with each other.
Stage magician Derren Brown used the trick against nine leading British chess players in his television show.
[16]
References
- ^ "Cheating Accusations in Mental Sports, Too". http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/08/sports/othersports/08chess.html?ex=1312689600&en=5292ff7841b05021&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss. Retrieved 2007-01-01.
- ^ "Cheating in world chess championships is nothing new, study suggests". http://news-info.wustl.edu/tips/page/normal/7935.html. Retrieved 2007-01-01.
- ^ "Did the Soviets Collude? A Statistical Analysis of Championship Chess 1940-64". http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=905612. Retrieved 2007-01-01.
- ^ http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3605
- ^ http://www.seniorchess.zoomshare.com/3.html
- ^ a b "Verdict on chess cheating this week". http://www.telegraphindia.com/1061212/asp/jamshedpu/story_7127264.asp. Retrieved 2006-12-28.
- ^ a b "Player expelled for technology misuse". http://www.hindu.com/2006/12/06/stories/2006120612002200.htm. Retrieved 2006-12-28.
- ^ a b "Chess player caught cheating with wireless device". http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/12/27/chess.cheater.reut/index.html. Retrieved 2006-12-28.
- ^ a b "Umakant Shama banned for 10 years". http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/007200612271550.htm. Retrieved 2006-12-28.
- ^ http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3280
- ^ http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/dutch-chess-player-banned-after-using-pocketfritz/
- ^ a b "Wesley So wins Dubai Open, player disqualified for cheating". ChessBase. http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=4570. Retrieved 2008-04-17.
- ^ http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/is-cheating-always-newsworthy/
- ^ "FIDE Ruling on Alexandru Crisan". The Week in Chess Magazine. London Chess Centre. 2001-09-07. http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/fidecrisan.html. Retrieved 2007-06-14.
- ^ "Chess Player Profile: Crisan, Alexandru". FIDE. http://ratings.fide.com/card.phtml?event=1201271. Retrieved 2009-03-26.
- ^ Daniels, Morgan (2004-04-29). "The magical chess experiment". Chessbase. http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1610. Retrieved 2009-03-26.
Chess is sports and is the only best medium in racial harmony with war and struggle on the 64 squares board only. At every chess events the players and parents of differ races become friends and does not show disharmony or racial walls for chess breaks down all walls with the motto GENS UNA SUMUS we are a family !!
Martha : Eh eem theres a free piece should I takeor ...look ladies its all nail biting !!
