Sunday, May 29, 2011

Confessions of a Blitzaholic - Is Blitz Good Or Bad?

Susan Polgar Chess Daily News and Information: Confessions of a Blitzaholic - Is Blitz Good Or Bad?

Confessions of a Blitzaholic - Is Blitz Good Or Bad?


Blitz Chess: Helps or Hurts?


By NM William Stewart
The timeless question ... Does Blitz Chess do more harm than good for your serious chess game? This question has puzzled chess players since the beginning of the game itself. I’m not surprised that in the short 5 months I've been running my website the topic has been already been brought up 3 times. Our contributing editor Martin wrote a popular article for our site entitled: Blitz Chess – The Pros and Cons where he concluded that playing blitz chess in moderation is ok. Contributing editor Daniel Naroditsky also mentioned his opinion on the subject in his introduction to his live blitz chess video Their consensus is that in moderation, chess blitz is OK. My opinion is a little bit different. While I love blitz chess far more than either Martin or Daniel, I'm here to admit it isn't good for you at all. This article is the confession of a true blitzaholic.

Blitz in moderation: a correct conclusion or nothing more than the fallacy of the middle ground?


But wait?
If your trying to become a good chess player we clearly know that too much blitz chess is bad for your game, but that doesn’t automatically mean that a little bit is good, or at least not harmful for your game. Wikipedia refers to the fallacy of the middle ground as “a logical fallacy which asserts that any given compromise between two positions must be correct.” E.G. If too much chess blitz is bad, and no chess blitz is bad, then a little bit of chess blitz must be good! As an avid blitz players it hurts me to say this but playing chess blitz in any amount is almost never beneficial for improving your low time-control chess game . It hurts me to admit this because I am, in fact, a Blitz-aholic.


But chess blitz is so much fun!


Blitz is definitely entertaining to play, and very fun to watch. It also allows players the opportunity to try out new ideas in a short period of time in an inconsequential game. Also, blitz can increase your tactical awareness and obviously facilitate faster play. Personally, I enjoy blitz because I can wildly sacrifice pieces and my opponent has less time to clarify the mess and refute objectively unsound attacks. Any of my friends know that I love playing blitz chess. Most young high rated players that got sucked into the chess world starting playing chess blitz online (the classic example being Nakamura). However, the popular opinion of nearly all high-level chess players that blitz is NOT good for your game and I reluctantly join them.


Compartmentalize your Blitz Skills and Regular Time-Control Skills Separately


To succeed in chess you need 2 mind sets: your “Blitz” mind and your “Regular Time-Control” mindset. I am struggling with this myself. Chess Blitz can seem the same as regular time control chess on a superficial level, there’s a clock, there’s the same rules, the same pieces, the same player on the other end of the table, but the mindset must separate how much time is given to you on that clock regardless of the similarities. They seem the same, but they are 2 separate “languages.” This is tough, but it must be learned.

My Final Thoughts on Blitz


Your ability to concentrate on a single game diminishes as playing habits are built around blitz games. For many of the same reasons that blitz is so fun – playing out many games in a short period, quick positional and tactical assessments, and unsound sacrificial attacks – blitz can be very harmful to your serious, slow chess game. I’m not recommending that people stop playing blitz, I'm simply saying that if you want to progress as a serious chess player – maybe you should reconsider the time you dedicate to playing meaningless blitz games and the time that you spend legitimately studying and deeply learning the game. And yes, this is coming from a blitzaholic.
By Will Stewart (USCF 2256, FIDE 2234) This video was an abbreviated article you can find the full version of the article here

Love & Hatred for Chess - Welcome to the official website of Natalia Pogonina!

Love & Hatred for Chess - Welcome to the official website of Natalia Pogonina!

Written by Administrator
Суббота, 28 Май 2011
Zhdanov Peter
Candidate master Peter Zhdanov's column at Pogonina.com

I tried quitting chess a couple of times, but it is harder than it sounds. After all, I love the game. Especially attractive to me is the analytical aspect - evaluating the position and finding the optimal move. A park player's joy of setting up a clever trap or swindling is not what appeals to me. Meanwhile, it is sad to realize that modern technologies leave us less and less space for creativity. I remember the times when PCs were no match for top humans. Now we are not even in contention. Correspondence chess is still alive though, as a smart operator using a chess engine is stronger than the engine itself. However, taking into account the trend, quite soon there would be no need in humans at all, and a win in correspondence chess will be achieved by the player who has the better PC.

What do I hate in chess? A very low ROI. You invest a lot and get virtually nothing in return. Natalia is often contacted by naive adults who ask something like: "I have recently learnt how to play chess and like your website and career a lot. Maybe I will also become a professional chess player. How do I make the first step?". What they miss out is that after like 10 years of toils they will hardly make it above a regular master. The tragedy is that there are many people in the world who are not able to set their priorities straight. As a result, they have no family, no job, don't go to college, lack serious hobbies, but keep playing chess day after day. I am not referring to people who have chosen a career in chess since being kids and became grandmasters before 20 y.o. The story is about "hostages of the game" - grown-up people who got stuck between amateur and professional level (2300-2500 for men, 2100-2300 for women). Alas, most of them have spent tonnes of time to achieve basically nothing. No real social respect and privileges, no money, no fame. Returning to my personal example: if I want to become an FM/IM, I will have to compete on par with the guys mentioned above. Ok, someone who is WAY more talented will be able to do it without wrecking his/her life entirely. However, if you are only somewhat more gifted, you will have to spare 2 or 3 hours daily for each 5 hours spent by them on chess. And what for?

Therefore, there are two reasonable ways -

a) very risky - aim for becoming a chess pro since very early age

b) treat chess as an exciting game, a hobby.

The in-between scenario is by far not the golden middle, as it creates huge risks of ending up being a nobody both in chess and in life.

Friday, May 27, 2011

Concerns over lack of interest in OKU rights

Concerns over lack of interest in OKU rights

OKUs need opportunities, not merely sympathy


BN masih gagal majukan OKU

BN masih gagal majukan OKU

Satelah melibatkan diri bersama OKU terutama dengan rakan peguan cacat penglihatan Dato Mah Hassan Omar, OKU selalu terpinggir. Da;am banyak kes yang di ketahui, pegawai yang bertanggung jawap selalu nya tidak ikhlas dalam tindakan mereka. Saorang OKU, cacat fisikal dan akal, ingin berdirikari sebab sudah berumur 26 tahun tapi tidak ada sesiapa yang sunggup mengambil beliau berkerja biar dinamakan sebagai Aziz. Aziz telah memohon untuk mendapat bantuan pendapatan RM300 sebulan untuk menambah pendapatan Rm6 sehari sebagai pencuci meja dan kedai.
Malang nya pegawai terlibat tidak meluluskan permohonan sebab bapa beliau berkemampuan, andaikata sekira nya bapa beliau sudah tidak betkemampuan siapa yang akan membela nasib Aziz melainkan diri nya sendiri. Ini merupakan satu kes yang Sifu ketahui dan satu kes lagi ialah saorang cacat akal yang sudah berumur 38 tahun di beri RM50 sebulan.
Beliau di jaga oleh saorang emak yang sudah tidak larat berumur 65 tahun, permohonan telah dibuat beberapa kali tapi tambahan peruntukan tidak diluluskan tanpa sebab dan beliau terpaksa memohon dari daerah lain untuk mendapat peruntukan bulanan tersebut mungkin sebab nya beliau duduk di sebuah rumah kampung yang besar tapi pegawai itu tidak melihat berapa daif nya keadaan dalam rumah untuk menjaga seorang dewasa yang tidak faham apa itu kesusahan tetapi mahu makan bila tiba masa bila beliau rasa lapar.
Saorang bapa saudara yang berjiran terpaksa menyara anak cacat ini walaupun beliau seorang nelayan, ini adalah hidup nya saorang OKU yang tidak mendapat sepatut nya walaupun kerajaan BN cakap akan membantu tapi banyak lagi OKU yang terpaksa mengemis untuk menyara hidup dan keluarga sebab mereka ini manusia yang mempunyai naluri yang sama saperti manisia lain.

Pawn Breaks: Part 2 - Chess.com

Pawn Breaks: Part 2 - Chess.com

Pawn Breaks: Part 2

Submitted by GM thamizhan on Chess.com

Continuing our study of important pawn breaks, we will take a look at some important ideas in the Sicilian Defense. We did have some comments about studying pawn breaks in other openings, and we can guarantee our viewers that we are definitely going to cover other openings as well in this theme, but we decided that the Sicilian being the most commonly played and the most dynamic opening in Chess, deserved our attention to start this series.

Last week we saw an important pawn break in g5 for black, which by the way white should try to avoid at all cost. Today we will take a look at some ideas relating to the f5 breakthrough that white does to open black's king side. While opening your opponent's king side is always a good thing, there always exists a problem of over-extension. In the case of the f5 breakthrough the e5 square becomes extremely weak. Hence, the basic idea is do not push f5 if you do not have a concrete idea of how to proceed. We will take a look at some important positions where this idea would come in handy.

Our first game is a very exciting attacking game from Grandmaster Surya Sekhar Ganguly against a compatriot from India, Grandmaster Abhijit Kunte. Ganguly used the f5 idea with tremendous ease and looked completely in control of the game. Sometimes, that is all that is required, play the right idea and just sit and watch how victory sails right to your door.

Ganguly, S. (2643) vs. Kunte, A. (2526)
ch-Asian Individual | Mashhad IRI | Round 5.6| 6 May 2011 | ECO: B85 | 1-0
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Be2 a6 7. O-O Nf6 8. Be3 d6 9. f4 Be7 10. a4 O-O 11. Kh1 Re8 12. Bf3 Bd7 13. Nb3 b6 14. g4 Bc8 15. g5 Nd7 16. Bg2 Rb8 17. Rf3 ( 17. Qh5 g6 18. Qh3 ( 18. Qh4 b5 19. axb5 axb5 20. Rf3 b4 21. Ne2 Bf8 22. Rh3 h5 23. f5 exf5 24. exf5 Ne7 25. Nbd4 Bb7 26. Rf1 Bxg2+ 27. Kxg2 Nc6 ( 27... Nd5! ) 28. Ne6 ) 18... Bf8 19. f5 Nde5 20. Rf4 Nb4 21. Nd4 Nc4 22. Bg1 exf5?! ( 22... e5 23. Rh4 h5 24. Nde2 d5! ) 23. exf5 Bb7 24. Raf1 Bxg2+ 25. Qxg2 Qb7 26. Nf3 ( 26. fxg6 Qxg2+ 27. Kxg2 fxg6 28. Ne4 ) 26... b5 27. axb5 axb5 28. Bd4 Nd5 29. Rh4 h5 30. gxh6 ) 17... Bf8 18. Rh3 g6 19. Qe1 Bg7 20. f5 ( 20. Qh4 Nf8 21. Rf1 Ne7 22. Qf2 ( 22. Rhf3 b5 23. axb5 axb5 24. Bd4 b4 25. Bxg7 Kxg7 26. Nd1 Ba6 27. Re1 Qxc2 28. Ne3 Qxb2 29. Nd1 Qc2 ) 22... Bd7 23. Rf3 b5 24. axb5 axb5 25. Bd4 b4 26. Bxg7 Kxg7 27. Nd1 Bb5 28. Re1 Bc6 29. Qd4+ e5 30. fxe5 dxe5 31. Qc4 Ne6 32. Nc5 Ng8 33. Na6 Qb7 34. Nxb8 Rxb8 35. Rg3 Rd8 36. c3 bxc3 37. Rxc3 Ne7 38. Rb3 Qd7 39. Ne3 Nxg5 40. Qc5 Qe6 41. Qc4 Rd4 42. Qxe6 Nxe6 43. Nf1 Nf4 44. Ng3 f5 45. Bf1 fxe4 46. Kg1 Nf5 47. Rc1 Bd5 48. Rc7+ Kh6 49. Nxf5+ gxf5 50. Rg3 Rd1 51. Rc2 Ng6 52. Rh3+ Kg7 53. Kf2 f4 ) 20... Nb4 ( 20... exf5 21. Nd5 Qd8 22. exf5 Nf8 23. f6 Bxh3 24. Bxh3 Bh8 25. Qf2 Nd7 26. Rd1 Nc5 27. Nd4 Nxd4 28. Rxd4 b5 29. axb5 Rxb5 30. b4 Ne6 31. Bxe6 Rxe6 32. c4 Rb8 33. Qf3 ) 21. f6 Bf8 ( 21... Nxc2 22. Qh4 h5 23. Bf3 Nxe3 24. Bxh5 Nf5 25. exf5 gxf5 26. Bf3 ) 22. Nd4 Ne5 23. Qh4 h6 ( 23... h5 24. Nde2 Nxc2 25. Nf4 ) 24. Rf1 Bd7 25. Rf4 d5 ( 25... Nc4 26. Qxh6 Bxh6 27. Rxh6 ) ( 25... h5 26. Nde2 Nxc2 27. Ng3 ) 26. Qxh6 Bxh6 27. Rxh6 Nf3 28. Rxf3 e5 29. Nf5

This one obviously did not go Kunte's way, but the game showed all of us a thing or two about the f5 pawn break and also about the beautiful finishing attack from Ganguly. The rooks lining up to checkmate on h8 was just unstoppable and a queen sacrifice to achieve this was just icing on the cake.

Our second game is where I(Magesh) played against then International Master Anton Korobov in the World Junior Championship in 2001.

As one can see white did not do anything extraordinary there, just playing f5 at the right time was good enough to secure a comfortable win. Our last game of the day is again my game against Grandmaster Amon Simutowe from Zambia in the New Jersey futurity tournament in 2007.

Again, not a very complicated game, simple development followed by f5 at the right time just let the flow of pieces happen with ease. Some correct technique to continue the attack was of course required to finish off the game. Hopefully our readers enjoyed the pawn break-through ideas at f5, we will have more on different squares arising from different openin